🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities will be slashed by more than half, after a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to submit the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include multiple elected officials based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to create a Māori ward by initially putting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities frequently devoted considerable time building local support and urging their local governments to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government permitted local councils to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, stating communities should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it wants to end “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to create other types of electoral districts – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Māori wards suggested the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that chose to keep their wards.