🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some participants encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where the same content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."