🔗 Share this article

For a lifelong Dodgers fan and third-generation Mexican American, the most memorable highlight of the World Series did not happen during the nail-biting finale last Saturday, when her squad pulled off one death-defying escape act after another and then prevailing in overtime over the opposing team.

It happened a game earlier, when two second-tier athletes, the Puerto Rican player and the Venezuelan infielder, pulled off a electrifying, decisive sequence that at the same time challenged numerous negative stereotypes touted about Latinos in the past years.

The play itself was stunning: Hernández charged in from the outfield to catch a ball he initially misjudged in the stadium lights, then threw it to second base to secure another, game-winning out. Rojas, at second base, received the ball just a split second before a runner collided with him, knocking him to the ground.

This was not merely a great athletic moment, possibly the key shift in momentum in the Dodgers' direction after appearing for much of the series like the weaker side. For Molina, it was exhilarating, politically and culturally, a badly needed morale boost for Latinos and for Los Angeles after a period of immigration raids, troops patrolling the neighborhoods, and a constant stream of criticism from official sources.

"Kike and Miggy presented this counter-narrative," explained Molina. "Everyone saw Latinos displaying an infectious pride and joy in what they do, acting as leaders on the team, exhibiting a different kind of masculinity. They're bombastic, they're yelling, they're taking off their shirts."

"It was such a contrast with what we observe on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos detained and pursued. It is so easy to be disheartened these days."

Not that it's entirely straightforward to be a Dodgers supporter these days – for her or for the legions of other fans who attend regularly to home games and occupy as many as 50% of the stadium's fifty thousand seats per game.

A Complicated Relationship with the Team

When intensified immigration raids started in Los Angeles in June, and military units were sent into the area to react to ensuing demonstrations, two of the city's sports clubs quickly released statements of solidarity with affected communities – but not the Dodgers.

Management has said the Dodgers prefer to steer clear of politics – a stance influenced, perhaps, by the fact that a sizable minority of the fans, even Latinos, are followers of current leaders. After considerable external demands, the organization later committed $1m in aid for families directly impacted by the raids but issued no official criticism of the administration.

Official Event and Historical Legacy

Three months before, the organization did not delay in accepting an invitation to mark their 2024 World Series victory at the White House – a move that local writers labeled as "pathetic … weak … and hypocritical", considering the team's boast in having been the first major league franchise to break the racial segregation in the mid-20th century and the regular references of that legacy and the principles it embodies by executives and current and former players. Several players such as the manager had expressed unwillingness to go to the White House during the first term but then reconsidered or succumbed to pressure from the organization.

Corporate Ownership and Fan Conflicts

An additional complication for fans is that the Dodgers are owned by a corporate behemoth, Guggenheim Partners, whose investments, according to sources and its own published financial documents, include a share in a detention company that runs enforcement centers. Guggenheim's leadership has stated repeatedly that it aims to stay out of political matters, but its critics say the inaction – and the financial stake – are their own type of acquiescence to certain policies.

These factors add up to significant mixed feelings among Hispanic fans in particular – feelings that surfaced even in the excitement of this year's hard-fought championship victory and the following explosion of Dodgers pride across Los Angeles.

"Is it okay to support the team?" area writer one observer reflected at the beginning of the postseason in an elegant article ruminating on "team loyalty in our blood, but uncertainty in our hearts". He couldn't finally bring himself to view the World Series, but he still cared strongly, to the point that he believed his personal boycott must have given the team the fortune it needed to win.

Separating the Team from the Owners

Many supporters who have Galindo's misgivings seem to have decided that they can keep to support the team and its lineup of global stars, including the Japanese superstar Shohei Ohtani, while pouring scorn on the organization's corporate overlords. Nowhere was this more clear than at the victory celebration at the home venue on Monday, when the packed audience cheered in approval of the coach and his athletes but booed the executive and the chief executive of the ownership group.

"The executives in suits don't get to take our players from us," Molina said. "We have been with the Dodgers longer than they have."

Historical Background and Community Effect

The issue, however, goes further than just the organization's present proprietors. The agreement that brought the former franchise to Los Angeles in the late 1950s involved the municipality demolishing three working-class Latino communities on a hill overlooking downtown and then transferring the land to the organization for a fraction of its market value. A song on a mid-2000s album that documents the story has an impoverished worker at the venue stating that the house he forfeited to removal is now third base.

Gustavo Arellano, perhaps the region's most widely followed Latino writer and media personality, sees a darker side to the long, dysfunctional dynamic between the franchise and its fanbase. He calls the Dodgers the popular snack of baseball, "a corporate entity with an excessive, even unhealthy devotion by too many Latinos" that has been shortchanging its fans for years.

"They've acted around Hispanic followers while picking their pockets with the other for so long because they have been able to avoid consequences," Arellano wrote over the warmer months, when calls to boycott the organization over its absence of response to the raids were contradicted by the uncomfortable fact that turnout at matches remained steady, even at the peak of the protests when the city center was under to a evening curfew.

International Stars and Community Bonds

Distinguishing the squad from its business leadership is not a simple matter, {